时间:2018-12-20 作者:英语课 分类:CNN美国有线新闻2018年5月


英语课

 


AZUZ: A former U.S. Supreme Court justice is calling for a major change to the U.S. constitution and his suggestion has stirred up debate and controversy across America. Former Justice John Paul Stevens served on the high court from 1975 until he retired in 2010.


He recently wrote an opinion essay that was published this week in "The New York Times". In it, he said the demonstrators who participated in last weekend's March for Our Lives events should go a step further than demanding new restrictions on gun ownership in America. He said that they should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.


That part of the U.S. Constitution says this: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Stevens, in line with what many gun control advocates argue, suggests that the Second Amendment is talking about militias having the right to bear arms, and he says, quote, that concern is a relic of the 18th century. But in 2008, the Supreme Court established that the Second Amendment applies to the individuals' right to bear arms, in line with what many gun rights advocates argue.


Former Justice Stevens was on the Supreme Court at the time of that ruling. He was among those who dissented or disagreed with it.


Stevens wrote that repealing the Second Amendment altogether would make it easier to create new gun restrictions.


U.S. President Donald Trump who himself has called for some new restrictions on buying guns and certain gun components responded that the Second Amendment would never be repealed. The White House says that the nation should focus on getting weapons away from dangerous people but not on, quote, blocking all Americans from their constitutional rights.


And Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress, even those who support new gun restrictions have indicated they also support the Second Amendment.


The U.S. Constitution has been amended 27 times since it was signed in 1787. Experts say it's very difficult to do. And even if Congress or the individual states met the threshold for a new amendment or a constitutional convention, it's still take three-fourths of the states to ratify any changes to the Constitution. None of its first 10 amendments has ever been repealed or changed.



学英语单词
acetone trichloride
adopt a counsel of despair
adulter
angular-contact ball bearing
art decoes
balance check
ballast slab
bearing inner spacer
belehradek
binder for tractor draft
Bleichheim
Buka Island
celesbian
Chari-Baguirmi, Préfect.du
chelidonoid
chronic superficial gastritis
Citrus tangelo
concrete bars
converyor
council of state
d.l.c.
de-emotionalizing
dense panicle
direct-verb
distressrocket
drill ga(u)ge
drunk driving
Dulas, Afon
earth and stone work
ellyria
exchange premium
false window
faunistic relation factor
fertilizer crasher
fish families
free from care
hat check
hauling-up device
hippophiles
hydrogenated shortening
interbubble channel
intermediate control office
jump on the band wagon
keep within the bounds
key fill gun
kinfo
kiss 'n' ride
kosova
marumerizer
mere stone
moonrise
named train
nasgraph
net currency
objective audiometry
open-market option
oreos
outside measurement
overdistended
p-nitro-alpha-acetylamino-beta-hydroxypropiophenone
P-RAM
parthias
piaaba
pippie,pippy
price level financial statements
production group
progonal fold
protective angle
proximodistal
radial principal stress
ragis
resultant compressive stress
rhetographical
rose beetles
rotating guide vane (rgv)
screwed groove
scrutine
semi-voiced
sheykh
silk-screener
single-sheet classification system
sludge press filter
spin relaxation time
spiring
spoked wheel
static reserve
steel plate door
streamie
stringboard
subtilisin
sycamore-tree
tassel hyacinths
thoracopathy
Tinto, R.
Town, Ithiel
truck loader
untreated timber pile
Veenhuizen
wage costs
walking iron
yoanna